Blog Layout

The Dynamics of Wolf Dentition (Part 1)

Tyler Brasington • Feb 03, 2024

What wolf teeth reveal about their lives, and survival in the wild

Introduction: The Visual Guide to Wolf Dentition and Age Determination is the most comprehensive guide to date, focusing on wolf dentition, and the approximation of age based on visual wear patterns. Far too often, dentition and the oral health of wildlife are either forgotten or neglected. The presence of certain dental pathologies, or wear patterns may yield information about the individual health of the animal, and prior exposure to disease.

 

Historical Context: Wolves have been an integral part of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) for thousands of years prior to the arrival of humans and inhabitants to the region. During the early 1900’s, wolves were eradicated in Yellowstone, leaving an enormous void, resulting in profound effects and impact to the ecosystem.

 

On January 12, 1995, the first gray wolves (Canis lupus) arrived from Canada to Yellowstone National Park, part of their reintroduction to the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE). Since reintroduction, the gray wolf has thrived in the GYE, especially within the confines and protection of Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Park. Arguably, gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park represent one of the most extensively studied wolf populations in the world, with decades of continuous research and consistent observation. Researchers, technicians, and biologists have intensively followed packs, documenting individuals’ life-histories for more than 25-years. The Yellowstone Wolf Project monitors wolves using VHF and GPS collars. During capture and handling, crews collect samples – allowing for genetic analysis and disease testing. From the ground and air, researchers gather crucial information on the population, pack composition, pup counts, behavior, territories, and species interactions.

 

Purpose: VHF and GPS collars also allow for known-fate monitoring, providing researchers information when a wolf has either died, or shed its collar. Since the reintroduction, the Yellowstone Wolf Project and winter studies have actively collected the remains of wolves upon their death, particularly their skulls. This presents the unique opportunity to analyze and study the oral and dental pathology of wild wolves.

 

In 2023, we accessed, analyzed, and photographed 204 wolf skull specimens in the Yellowstone Heritage and Research Center, for the purpose of developing a visual guide for wolf dentition and age determination. A previous study Gipson et al., 2000, provided an aging and dentition diagram for estimating age in wolves based on tooth wear. While this diagram has been helpful to field crews- providing a visual guide will further help allow biologists and technicians estimate the age of the wolf in hand by comparing photos of known age individuals. The visual guide also allows for biologists and technicians to identify the unique variations, and sometimes anomalies within and between age classes. The Yellowstone and Grand Teton wolf programs calculate the ages of the study wolves by utilizing a standard date of birth for pups from any given year (April 15) to their known, or approximate date of death.

 

What is the importance of dentition and age determination? You may ask, why is dentition and age determination important? Dental disorders are an important aspect of canid health. Documenting the prevalence of various dental/oral pathologies in wolves will contribute to our understanding of their overall health, while further advancing our understanding of dental diseases present within the populations. Age determination is also important to describe age-specific mortality, which is considerably important in wolf population dynamics.

 

Guide Layout and Information: The guide was assembled using tooth photos from wolf specimens photographed in the Yellowstone Heritage and Research Center in Gardiner, Montana. Additionally, a handful of dental photos from captured/immobilized wolves are included for reference from the Yellowstone Wolf Project. Each of the 204 wolf skulls photographed from the Heritage and Research Center were catalogued for future use.

Guide Content: In the guide, we review canid dentition basics including their dental formula, criteria for aging, characteristics of tooth wear, terminology and anatomy, and dental diagrams. We also delve into the interpretation of osteological specimens versus living wolves, and what specifically to look at when estimating their age based on visual wear and other characteristics. Moreover, the interpretation and identification of oral ante, peri, and postmortem injuries is important. We provide examples of all three categorizations of injuries that field staff may encounter when utilizing the guide and handling living wolves. The guide also provides a brief overview of some of the oral pathologies that may be observed macroscopically including pulp exposure and necrosis, exposure of tertiary and secondary dentin, gingival recession, missing teeth, and attrition. We also discuss enamel hypoplasia, and the importance of its recognition. The presence of enamel hypoplasia may represent exposure to canine distemper virus (CDV).

 

We recognized certain variables when using a visual guide to estimate the age of wolves. Some of these include:

-       Was the wolf held in an acclimation pen or trap during reintroduction?

-       Was the wolf exposed to disease during the development of adult teeth?

-       Was there untraditional or unusual wear inconsistent with the wolf’s age?

 

We addressed these variables in the guide. Wolves that were held in acclimation pens are identified and received a designation. Wolves that were born during CDV outbreak years are identified, and the same for those wolves born during potential CDV outbreak years. Some wolves died from disease, and users may find that information listed under individual profiles under cause of death. Wolves that demonstrated or displayed unusual tooth wear patterns, or missing significant teeth (postmortem, likely due to handling) were excluded from the guide. Only the best possible specimen’s representative of their respective age classes were included.

 

Access the Visual Guide to Wolf Dentition and Age Determination here.


Acknowledgments: A special thank you to Kira Cassidy, who provided comments and review, significantly improving this summary.

Tyler Brasington, Biologist and large carnivore specialist.

Tyler Brasington is biologist and large carnivore specialist. His research and work have focused on the ecology, biology, and management of grizzly bears and other large carnivores. More recently, he has taken interest in studying the oral pathology and periodontal health of large carnivores throughout the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE). Tyler has worked seasonally in Grand Teton National Park since 2017 and is currently a Lead Park Ranger for the Bear Management Office. Tyler received his bachelor’s in environmental science from the University of Wisconsin – Whitewater and completed his master’s degree in natural resources from the University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point.


Email: brasington.tyler@gmail.com


Share with your Connections

More articles for you....

By Mark R. Johnson DVM 01 Apr, 2024
As field questions arise, I'll be posting them on this Wildlife Capture and Care Blog. Follow us as field topics come up for discussion.  --- -- --- COVID Exposure to Bait Used for Capturing Lynx
In the course of our work on the African continent, we are fortunate to work with a number of charis
By Dr. Joel Alves 23 Jul, 2022
In the course of our work on the African continent, we are fortunate to work with a number of charismatic species and none-more-so than the ones with sharp claws and teeth.
By Dr. Mark 17 May, 2022
Here is a great question sent to me from a wildlife biologist taking my online course, “The Foundations of Wildlife Chemical Capture”. Dr. Mark Colleen asks: Dr. Mark, I just finished Chapter 2 where you discussed the importance of accurate weight estimates to determine safe and effective immobilizing drug doses. I see you mentioned observing the ear size in relation to the body, but what are your other go-to observations for estimating body weight for bears? Dr. Mark’s reply: Great question. I have three predominant aspects that I consider when estimating body weight for bears: Ears give me a sense of how old the bear is. As bears grow, their head grows but their ears do not. So a big-eared bear is a small younger bear. A bear with little ears (relative to head size) is an older larger bear. We’re often estimating bear weights when they are in a culvert trap so I first notice if it is a large or small culvert trap because traps vary in size. A small culvert trap will make me think it is a larger bear and can skew my estimate. A larger trap will make a bear look smaller. My strongest reference is writing down my weight estimates on the drugging field form every time we do a capture. We also document actual weight as well. That way we are learning from every animal. When I have a partner at the capture, I ask them to also write down their weight estimate. After we weigh the bear, we know that whoever is least accurate buys the next coffee. It is interesting to note that we have always strived for being accurate with animal weight estimates within 10%. That is the professional standard. I realized that we strive to be accurate within 10% because when we work with ketamine/xylazine and Telazol combinations (which I have done for decades), small variations in dose really makes a difference in the downtime and depth of immobilization. Many biologists are now immobilizing bears with BAM and BAM is more forgiving. We can be 25% off in our weight estimates and not notice a difference in the immobilization. One major reason for this with BAM is that we have reversals to wake up an animal when we’re done. With ketamine/xylazine and Telazol combinations the anesthetics are not reversible. With Telazol, we have to wait for them to wake up and we must wait for ketamine to wear off before we administer the reversal for xylazine. So we don’t want to give them any more than we need to, but we want to be confident that we gave enough! In all cases, we still strive to be accurate within 10% for safe and successful wildlife immobilizations. To recap: Look at the ears Look at the culvert size Write down both estimated weight and actual weight on the field form so we learn from each animal. Care to learn more? Register for the online course, “The Foundations of Wildlife Chemical Capture“ .
Dear colleagues, it is a pleasure to have guest author, Dr. Liesel Laubscher of Wildlife Pharmaceuti
By Dr. Liesel Laubscher 30 Apr, 2022
Dear colleagues, it is a pleasure to have guest author, Dr. Liesel Laubscher of Wildlife Pharmaceuticals South Africa present this article on potent opioids. Dr. Mark
The Foundations Course Reviewed by Journal of Wildlife Diseases
By Dr. Mark 31 Oct, 2021
It is an honor to have the Journal of Wildlife Diseases (JWD) review our online course, The Foundations of Wildlife Chemical Capture. This is likely the first time JWD has reviewed an online course.
Collaring a lynx in Alaska
By Dr. Mark 21 May, 2021
Dr. Mark describes creating new drug combinations for immobilizing lynx Note: This blog article is a bit technical but it covers the basics for how to choose an immobilizing drug combination for a wildlife research or management program.
Wildlife Health podcast - Untold stories from 35 years of wildlife handling.
By Dr. Mark 15 Mar, 2021
Dr. Michelle Kneeland of WildlifeHealth.org is presenting a podcast interview with me as I share my stories and adventures from 35 years as a wildlife veterinarian. Listen to me describe a mountain lion capture in a severe winter storm. Hear what it feels like capturing grizzly bears.
wildlife pharmaceuticals
By George Carballo 11 Mar, 2021
Wildlife Pharmaceuticals and its subsidiary, ZooPharm, the legacy of retired Bill Lance, DVM, MS, PhD, are now part of the largest veterinary-compounding pharmacy in the U.S., Wedgewood Pharmacy, a respected name known to 9 in 10 veterinarians in the U.S. The acquisition was completed this past summer.
Capturing and chemically immobilizing bears is stressful for the animal. Therefore, it is imperative
By Tyler Brasington 12 Oct, 2020
Capturing and chemically immobilizing bears is stressful for the animal. Therefore, it is imperative that researchers and managers justify all capture events, thoroughly evaluating potential alternatives to a hands-on approach.
 I am honored to have Michelle Kneeland DVM write this inspiring article.
By Michelle Kneeland 27 Jul, 2020
“Dear colleagues, I am honored to have Michelle Kneeland DVM write this inspiring article. This blog will have guest authors once a month. Thank you, Michelle!” Dr. Mark Many wildlife students are becoming dismayed by the current job market and difficulties they face...
More Posts
Share by: